The Testing is basically the lovechild of The Hunger Games and Divergent. However, in my opinion, this one seems a bit more plausible than either series. Colleges and universities are already competitive so why not make applicants duke it out to win a FREE spot. Shoot, I’d take it. If there was more than one university in this futuristic version of America, it’d be even more believable.
Our main character, Malencia (Cia) Vale, really wants to go to university in the Capitol…I mean, Tosu City, which is indeed the Capitol of the United Commonwealth, and the only way to do that is to have students selected to participate in The Testing. Not only did they have the vastly normal standardized tests (which I’ve always hated), but there’s also hands-on experiments, group work (which again I hated), and a seven-hundred mile trek through a war-torn, poisonous landscape. Yeah, that escalated pretty quickly.
Even though I did think that the premise is plausible, the book was just okay. I really liked the beginning that covered Cia’s graduation, nervousness about whether she’d be accepted for the Testing, being accepted and then meeting other Testing candidates. I also really liked the way the first three tests were done. They were “normal” with definite catches. There were some casualties over the course of these, and I do have to mention a suicide does take place within this book. It was shocking and disturbing.
The fourth test, for me, lost all plausibility. It was basically The Hunger Games and took up at least half of the novel. Not only did Cia and her love interest have to find each other and then survive in the wilderness, but they additionally had to face other candidates who wanted to kill off the competition. I would have liked the novel so much better if the fourth test could have consisted of literally ANYTHING else.
Also, some of the characters I felt were entirely one-dimensional…namely Cia. We knew she was smart because she was selected for The Testing and that she was close to her family, but that was about it. She just had no personality, likes beyond her love interest, or dislikes. I couldn’t even manage to put a face to her. The “empty” protagonist works in other novels (i.e the Hunger Games again) because in other dystopians, the citizens aren’t supposed to have a personality because their identities have been basically stripped away. However, Cia is allowed to have a pretty great childhood. Many of the other Testing candidates, including Cia’s love interest, were much more distinctive.
Again, I thought The Testing was okay. Just…okay. Maybe I’ll continue with the rest of the series. I don’t know yet. I hope the next two books will be a bit more original though.
Rating: 3 stars
The concept behind Some Luck by Jane Smiley was cute. Every chapter in the novel is a year from 1920-1953 and covers a few moments in the life of a farming family from a small town in Iowa. It starts when the eldest child is about a year old and ends when he is thirty-three. I understand that this novel could be boring for most people, but I liked it for what it was.
What I Liked:
It felt like I was a guest of the Langdon family as I hung out with the patriarchs of the family, Walter and Rosanna, their six children, Frank, Joe, Mary, Lillian, Henry, and finally baby Claire, and other extended family and friends. Through the novel we see each child grow up and into their own person. There were definitely some characters I liked better than others. Out of the Langdons, I really liked Frank and Lillian, and even Rosanna’s sister, the feisty and outspoken Eloise. If we had seen more of her (basically if she was the main character), she would have most likely been my favorite. I also like how some characters made questionable decisions, but this just made them that much more human.
The passage of time in the novel was again a really great concept. The novel covers the Roaring Twenties, the Great Depression, World War II, and the beginning of the Cold War all through the eyes of this one family. And we get to know them through how they react to these important moments in history.
What Was Meh:
Much of the beginning of the novel was about daily life on a farm. While I do respect those who farm and grew up on farms and stuff, whoo boy was this boring. There was chapter after chapter of talk about which crops grew better with which soil, and I almost fell asleep. The book didn’t truly get interesting until the children began to branch out and realize there was much more to life beyond their small farm.
Also, I felt some chapters just ended too abruptly. I’d be getting really involved with a character or a story line, and then next thing I knew, it’d be the end of the chapter. The novel itself actually ended this way after a HUGE moment, and even though I’m excited to move on to Book 2, I’m still sooooo mad.
I really did like this novel and I can’t wait to dive into Book 2, Early Warning. I’m rating this novel a 4, because even though I did like it, I did get pretty bored and I hope the chapters don’t go too fast in the next one.
Gone With the Wind is one of my favorite movies so naturally I had to grab this book since it focused on the making of the movie and the love story between Hollywood legends Carole Lombard and Clark Gable.
The novel follows our protagonist, Julie, a good girl from Indiana, who goes to Hollywood to be a famous screenwriter. Something women were not particularly known for yet. Through a couple of lucky breaks, Julie ends up becoming Carole Lombard’s personal assistant and best friend. While this was a bit far-fetched, I did suspend my belief and wasn’t too bothered by it. After all, who doesn’t wish they could be their favorite actor’s assistant? Julie achieved the dream.
What I Liked:
I LOVED the setting of 1930s Hollywood and seeing GWTW behind-the-scenes. There were a lot of little tidbits I didn’t know about. For example, it took a really long time to find a Scarlett and thousands of actresses read for the part before it was given to Vivien Leigh. I’ve seen some of those screen tests and it’s obvious that Leigh was the right one for the part. Also, Clark Gable was very much against segregation and demanded the bathrooms on the set be integrated. When it was known that GWTW’s African American actors would not be welcomed at the Atlanta premiere, Gable actually refused to attend and basically had to be bribed. He actually seems like a pretty chill dude. However, there is one scene where he uses a slur against the openly gay George Cukor, but I had to remember that this is the 1930s and people were not particularly as accepting of members of the LGBT community as we are now.
Carole Lombard was my favorite character. I’ve seen any of her movies, but she seems like she was an amazing person. There’s a scene where one of the production studios’ employees asks to keep a record of her menstrual cycle and she basically tells him to stuff it (in harsher words than that). Even though she at first seems like a jaded Hollywood veteran, she’s still optimistic about the world and her love for Clark.
What I thought was Meh:
I had a bit of a problem with the main character, Julie. She had absolutely no personality and was basically a conduit used to learn more about this world of Hollywood. She doesn’t really make any decisions for herself and does whatever Carole or her boyfriend, Andy, says. Through her, you do learn about how difficult it was as a woman trying to make her mark in Hollywood. There’s a scene where a man asks for sex in order to give her the job of her dreams. It’s disgusting and you definitely feel for her.
Also, the main love story between Julie and David Selznick’s assistant, Andy, really fell flat when parallel with the real story between Gable and Lombard and even the fictional one between Scarlett and Rhett. There was chemistry there but after reading about them arguing for the fifth time, their flame started to flicker. Also, many times Julie is left wondering why Andy is so distant and does not seem to understand he’s a Jewish man living in 1939 with relatives in Nazi Germany. Like obviously he has bigger things to worry about than when you’re going to spoon next, Julie. Ugh, I wanted to smack her with a newspaper and then make her read it.
Even though I didn’t enjoy the main character, A Touch of Stardust is an interesting story about making it in Hollywood. The scenes about making GWTW the iconic movie it is today is worth the read though.
Rating: 3 stars
Disclaimer: If you believe Trayvon Martin, Mike Brown, Eric Garner, Philando Castile, Freddie Gray, Tamir Rice, Ezell Ford, Rekia Boyd, Sandra Bland, etc. deserved to be killed, kindly leave my blog and never come back. Kay, thanks…
Also, I have nothing against cops; in fact, my aunt’s a cop, and I respect the jobs they have to do and know that the good cops outweigh the bad ones. I do have something against cops who shoot first and ask questions later, are racist, or just are all-around shitty people.
The Hate U Give is an extremely powerful novel stemming from the Black Lives Matter Movement and multitude of cases where unarmed African American men, women, and children have been gunned down by (mostly) white police officers. It is a novel that needs to be read in today’s current political climate, especially by teenagers. The novel follows Starr Carter, a girl who feels she is straddling two worlds: her life in a not-so-great neighborhood where gangs run the streets and her predominantly white prep school. After leaving a party, Starr becomes the sole witness of the murder of her best friend, Khalil, at the hand of a white police officer. Starr is the only one who is able to give the full story about what happened that night and there are some who don’t want that story told.
What I Liked:
ALL OF THE THINGS!
First, I love Angie Thomas’s prose and writing style: simple yet powerful. I also really love that Ms. Thomas used a lot of slang and even cuss words within the novel. It made the novel so much more authentic. I mean, people can be up in arms about there being cursing in YA novels all they want, but there’s no use pretending that teens don’t cuss. And this is coming from someone who said “What the fluffer-nutter!” until my junior year of college.
The characters are just amazing, especially Starr, her parents, brothers, and other relatives. They were not perfect by any means, but their love and devotion for each other was solid. Starr’s father’s character arc is one we don’t normally see: an ex-gang member trying to redeem himself in the eyes of his wife, children, and community. The bond Starr has with him brought tears to my eyes on numerous occasions.
Starr’s relationship with her boyfriend, Chris, was really cute. If there’s a sequel or companion novel, they still better be together.
I definitely side-eyed Starr’s friend, Hailey. She’s that type of friend that leaves you constantly cringing about whether what came out of her mouth might have been racist but to avoid drama you don’t say anything. I have definitely learned that when it comes to these types of so-called friends, you have put a lid on comments that offend you from the get-go or they’ll constantly think you’re okay with it.
However, the cop that killed Khalil and the cops that tried to justify Khalil’s death especially bothered me. Just because someone sells drugs does not mean they deserve to die! Especially not in cold blood. You see this again and again with these cases. Look at the Mike Brown case. They made him seem like a thug to make his death seem justified and it’s not fair. With Philando Castile, they said he was a monster because he smoked weed in front of his child but there was recently an article about “supermoms” who smoke weed. And don’t tell me it has nothing to do with race because it does but that’s a post for another day.
The only thing I particularly didn’t like about the novel was King, the neighborhood drug lord. Ugh I wanted to slap him with a brick on every page he was on.
I appreciated how realistic the verdict was, and understood why the author wrote the ending the way she did.
There is honestly so much more I can say about this novel, but I have to say you have to read it for yourself. I am floored that it took me this long to read this. I firmly recommend The Hate U Give to everyone, especially African American teenagers. After all , the scene where Starr describes being talked to about what to do if stopped by a cop is a common staple in many homes, including mine. The problem is that it shouldn’t be. Ms. Thomas’s book is a stunning one about police brutality and its consequences.
The Lines We Cross is a thought-provoking novel with an important message that resonates with the political climate of today. Our two protagonists are as different from each other as night and day. Michael is the son of two avid anti-immigration activists who believe immigrants should completely assimilate into the Australian culture. Mina is a refugee from Afghanistan whose life is starting to look just a bit brighter…until she has to move to an upper middle class neighborhood to Michael’s private school and ends up clashing with Michael’s parents’ group, Aussie Values.
What I Liked:
I absolutely loved Mina’s character! She was intelligent, sarcastic, and sassy…basically everything I could ever want in a main character. In the beginning of the novel, Mina feels like a fish-out-of-water. She has moved from her multicultural neighborhood in West Sydney to attend a prestigious private high school. Her growth over the course of the novel from insecure new student to confident young woman was endearing. I also absolutely loved her family. I was glad to see Mina’s stepfather depicted as endearing and a doting husband and father.
I also loved the moment when Michael began thinking for himself and stopped regurgitating the things his parents and Terrance told him to. Michael, as a character, I kept going back and forth about liking. I wish he had started thinking for himself and questioning his parents’ values before he met Mina. While she did serve as the catalyst for his change, it seems that he ONLY changed just to impress her.
The setting of Australia was different and refreshing to me. I personally can’t recall reading a YA contemporary novel not set in the States or the UK. It was a nice change and I enjoyed learning about Australian culture. Personally, I didn’t think about the fact Australians go through a lot of what we go through here in the United States, such as a tense political climate.
The writing was superb and kept me transfixed. I couldn’t put the book down except to go to work and to sleep. I loved Fattah’s prose.
Also, Paula and Mina are 100% BFF goals.
What I Didn’t Like (and it Worked):
Ugh. Michael’s parents and their friends disgusted me. They were so condescending and patronizing. My problem with them was that their brand of racism is the type where they believe what they’re doing is right for those “inferior” to them. Every time they spoke, it just ground my gears. I also wasn’t too fond of their treatment of Michael’s younger brother who is definitely coded as being autistic thought it is never mentioned. What REALLY made me mad was when reading about how their mother told her child who takes everything literally to “Get out of her way” and the poor boy ended up having to be brought to her by the police because he thought she meant her words. It’s treated as a cute memory but I was kind of disturbed. It only made me dislike Michael’s parents a lot more.
I loved this book immensely and it is definitely a novel we need in today’s world. It teaches us to have compassion to those who may not look like us. I laughed, I cried, and I laughed some more. I highly recommend it to everyone, especially people who want to view life through another’s eyes.
This is the second book in Juliet Grey’s Marie Antoinette trilogy. I sincerely loved the first book in this series, so I’m completely disappointed to say I did not particularly this one. Days of Splendor, Days of Sorrow begins immediately after King Louis XV’s death and the ascension of Queen Marie Antoinette and her husband King Louis XVI. I tried to stick it out with this one since April 30 and I ended up DNFing it about 70% in.
What I Liked:
The coverage of the American Revolution through the eyes of the court of Versailles.
I was genuinely happy when Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI finally consummated their marriage (after 7 years) and had their children. However, if Louis XVI hadn’t been a coward, he would’ve gotten that surgery years before. But no….ugh….
What I Didn’t Like:
I feel like Juliet Grey did the complete opposite of everything she did that made me love Becoming Marie Antoinette. I didn’t like the sudden changes from Marie Antoinette’s first-person POV to third-person omniscient within the same chapter. Even sometimes on the same page. It was very jarring and took me out of the narrative. I would think it’s Marie narrating, realize it’s not, and then have to go back and reread everything I just read! I thought it was REALLY annoying because those sections focused on characters I didn’t particularly care for.
Also, Grey did that thing where Marie went from a relatable human being to a harpy who only cared about nice clothes, gambling, and doing everything but being a queen. I quickly found her annoying. When people complain about her, she’s truly confused as to why no one likes her. It’s because you’re out here gambling away 500,000 livres and your people out here starving, honey boo boo.
Marie Antoinette cheating on her husband was frustrating for me, and I spent the chapter yelling at her for it. HOWEVER, if Louis XVI was really as neglectful as the book portrays him to be, then I can almost understand her. I absolutely do not condone cheating, but it’s as if Louis purposefully pushes her into the arms of Axel just so he can get her to leave him alone. He barely appears throughout the entire novel. If I was married to him, I’d probably gamble all of my money and party all of the time too. They declared that they loved each other in the novel, but it felt like they were just saying it to say it.
I don’t understand why authors don’t spend time creating a sweet love story between them. Just because they didn’t fall into bed with each other every two seconds doesn’t mean they might not have loved each other. I would much rather read a sweet awkward love story between the two than this.
Since I ended up DNFing this book, it does not get a good grade from me. Will I read the last book in the trilogy? Probaby, because I’m a masochist.
But also because I feel bad because for some odd reason, she’s one of my favorite historical figures.
Becoming Marie Antoinette is an intriguing novel that follows the early life of doomed queen Marie Antoinette from her early years as a child in Austria under her formidable mother, the Empress Maria Theresa, to her ascension as queen of France. I’m actually surprised at how much I enjoyed this book, even though I did put it down at one point.
What I Liked:
Juliet Grey managed to humanize Marie Antoinette. In so many other novels I’ve read, Marie is either portrayed as a saint or as the devil incarnate. There’s not usually a happy medium. However, in this book, while Marie is shown with both good and flawed character traits, like any character should. This portrayal really makes her feel relatable. I mean, it couldn’t have been easy leaving the only home you’ve ever known to marry a boy you’ve never met at the age of fourteen. When I was fourteen, I was still under the impression that I had to put my arms and legs inside my blankets so nothing would “get” me. In other words, if I was her, I’d be pretty inept. Now, I’m not exactly saying that she was inept when she got to France, but she could’ve benefited from one more year at home with her mother. She never understood how precarious her position as the dauphine and thus the queen of France was. Hell, she couldn’t even take part in politics because it wasn’t something the queen consort of France should worry her pretty little head about. Ugh. No wonder all she cared about was having fun and gambling. That’s probably all I would have cared about, too.
The author also managed to bring Versailles to life, especially the ridiculous rules regarding the etiquette of the royal court. I would have HATED living in the French court back then…I mean, French revolution aside, but if I couldn’t get dressed without my underwear being passed around from noblewoman to princess to Princess of the Blood, I would have cursed out everyone within hearing distance and then be sent back to whatever country I came from.
What I Thought Was Meh:
Louis Auguste. Poor, awkward Louis Auguste. I kind of felt sorry for our dear dauphin. He’s just sooooo awkward. However, he annoyed the hell out of me, because Marie would be trying to tell him how she felt and he’d just repeat something one of his tutors told him. Like, damn it, Louis, you’re going to be the king of France. Grow a backbone! Also, there’s all this build up about why they didn’t consummate their marriage, but it’s left by the wayside and will get picked back up in the second book. If you studied history, you know why it took so long, but it didn’t need to be treated like it was some big secret. I did love his character when he and Marie would have their tender moments though. Hopefully, there’ll be more of those in the sequel.
The conflict between Marie and the king’s mistress, Madame du Barry, was equally awkward, and it didn’t need to happen. I know it does happen in history, and Marie uttered her utterly insipid line about how there’s people at Versailles, but the way it’s portrayed in this novel made me want to bang my head on the wall. A good five chapters was spent with Marie going “Should I talk to her?” and then “No, she’s a whore” over and over again. And it was especially annoying that the only reason she started this whole conflict was because Marie got advice from people she should’ve ran away screaming from. At least it was entertaining.
What I Didn’t Like:
The pacing!!!!!!! I ended up putting the novel down toward the beginning of the novel, because the chapters where she’s training to be the dauphine were just soooooooo boring. I can only read so much about the Versailles glide and her hideous medieval braces for so long. Don’t get me wrong, I did find all of this interesting, but not interesting enough. I did soldier through though and the pacing did pick up once she (FINALLY!) arrived at Versailles.
All in all, I liked Becoming Marie Antoinette. Even though the pacing was really slow, I did love Marie’s character and she had me laughing out loud during some scenes. It’s really like listening to Marie Antoinette tell her story. I do plan to start the next book soon!